What Is It With Philadelphians?
Many people have said that Philly fans are unlike any other fans in the country. Most Philly fans pride themselves on observations like that, even though the people making the observations rarely mean them as a compliment. I used to staunchly defend Philly fans while I lived in Pittsburgh and then Atlanta. I also used to pine for the days of talk radio that actually discussed the Eagles and Phillies instead of the Steelers and Penguins or the Braves and Falcons. Then I moved back to Philly and became reaquainted with 610 and the local fans.
I'm sure every city has boorish fans that are utterly clueless as to what their local teams need to improve. I imagine cities like Boston and New York and any other city passionate about certain teams has fans that scream and bitch about players that aren't the problem and has radio hosts that promote their ridiculous ideas, but I just can't imagine it happening more often than it happens in Philly. It certainly didn't happen in Pittsburgh or Atlanta (although Atlanta fans aren't passionate about much other than SEC football).
It just seems to me that Philly fans have the biggest love/hate relationship with the marquee players on the local teams. One minute they love the headline guys, the next minute they can't stand them. The marquee players go from being leaders to being considered overpaid or lazy. Normally this coincides with the general decline of the team, which is not unusual, but it seems to be more pronounced in this City then anywhere else.
The current and obvious examples of this phenomenon are Pat Burrell and Bobby Abreu. As I have written a number of times, fans continuely call in to 610 to complain about Burrell and Abreu (even when the Phillies are winning), as if the fact that the Phillies are inconsistent and hovering around .500 is the direct result of these two players' shortcomings. The animosity toward these two guys is mystifying.
Bobby Abreu has consistently been the most productive hitter on the team for as long as I can remember. He is a two-time All Star. He won the homerun derby (which means nothing, but it was still a bright spot for the Phillies). He is the rare combination of power and speed that major league baseball has only seen on two prior occasions, in Bobby and Barry Bonds. He never gets in trouble outside of the game. He is always in a good mood. When players, including stand-up guys like Jim Thome, were bashing Larry Bowa, Bobby never made a sound. So, my question is: What the fuck is the deal with disliking this guy? I can list stat after stat to rebuke the idiotic rumors that Abreu doesn't hit in the clutch and that he is a defensive liability. Both of those arguments are unsubstantiated and flat out inaccurate. So what is it?
Similarly, Pat Burrell has worked hard to improve after two disppointing seasons in 2003 and 2004. And he has improved, dramatically. He led the team in homers and RBIs last year and he is putting together another impressive statistical season this year as well. Not to mention, he is the only right-handed power hitter we have. Is he the best fielder in the world? No, he is slow, he can't help that. But, he has a cannon for an arm and he has played through two significant injuries (his wrist last year and his foot this year). Isn't this the type of dedication and production that a city like Philly should be lauding? Burrell is really an amazing case. When he was in the midst of those two horrendous years, people cheered and cheered for him at the park to try to will him to get better. It was truly amazing considering the treatment most players get in this town when they stink up the joint. But, now that he has turned the corner and is making good on his ability, we want to get rid of him? Can someone please explain this to me?
This is not a new thing for Philly. Unfortunately it has been going on for decades. We complained about Mike Schmidt because he seemed aloof and uncaring. We complained about Steve Carlton, because he was a complete ass to the media. We complained about Curt Schilling. We complained about Scott Rolen. We couldn't wait to get rid of Charles Barkley. We gnashed our teeth over Ron Jaworski (although, you would never know it now, the way people talk about him). As we speak, the fans are yammering about getting rid of Allen Iverson and Chris Webber. Donovan McNabb has felt, and will continue to feel, the full brunt of these critiques, as if getting a sports hernia and having a shitty defense were his fault. Who cares that he has led the Eagles to the Super Bowl and to 4 straight NFC Championship games? Not the fans around here apparantly.
Some of these players brought this criticism on themselves with their behavior and their comments, others haven't; none of them brought it on by their play. The other thing they all have in common is that no matter how crappy their respective teams were, these players were most assuredly not the problem. In fact, the teams would probably have been shittier if these vilified marquee players weren't around, as evidenced by the sorry state of the Sixers in the post-Barkley era, and more recently by the atrocious Eagles of last year, minus Mr. McNabb.
In any case, I feel sorry for the fans in this City, when it comes to players such as these. How often does a hitter of Abreu's caliber wear a Phillies uniform? How many times have the Eagles had a QB that is universally considered one of the Top 5 QBs in the NFL? When was the last time the Sixers had an MVP gaurd that will go down as one of the most prolific scorers in NBA history?
I understand that teams need to make moves sometimes to make themselves better, or move in another direction. But fans shouldn't be so quick to call for the ouster of the town's star players. Sometimes moving a superstar works to your advantage, but more often then not, all you are left with is Tim Perry, Jeff Hornecek, Andrew Lang and a lot of missed chances to truly appreciate the player you just lost.